🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam ruling, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that could add up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had invalidated the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, creating much confusion and disturbing the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its action.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely classified voters by their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries created after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

Through a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, observing that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Battle

The court's action is part of a countrywide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Usually, map-drawing takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that are estimated to yield a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, in response, have countered with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State AG praised the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, opposition party leaders lamented the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party election organization.

A leading House figure said the court had once again eroded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.