🔗 Share this article

The move by the DNC to withhold the public viewing of its internal post-election analysis concerning the 2024 election is stunning but entirely predictable. Resistant to hard truths, the Democrats' governing body behaves more like a communications shop than an electoral entity committed to building local power for winning elections.

A Culture That Avoids Dissent

Hesitant to challenge the party establishment's culture of conformity, the committee has continued under the Biden-Harris shadow throughout this past year. Publishing such a report might have shown whether the leadership are interested to foster public discourse about the strategic failures which allowed the former president to become president again. However, the leadership is moving forward as if there's nothing to understand following the stunning loss from the last cycle.

Our guiding principle: is this good for winning elections? If the answer is no, it becomes a sideline issue from our fundamental goal," a rationale that has been offered for withholding the document.

Major Failures an Autopsy Could Have Addressed

Any valuable post-mortem with any value would tackle head-on key points of failure. Among them are:

• Voter Disengagement: Losing among a significant portion of the electorate who supported the party's candidate during the previous election became a critical factor in the narrowly decided recent race.
• A Insistence to Run: The determined decision by a party leader to run again, coupled with an extremely delayed withdrawal, is viewed as robbing the party's base of a genuine choice.
• Losing Touch With the Working-Class Base: Amid rising costs, the electoral effort reportedly ceding to elite contributors while failing to challenge the effects of corporate greed.
• A Gaza Impact: The failure to reconsider an approach on the situation in Gaza reportedly led to driving away key demographic groups, especially with youth voters, Arab-Americans, Muslim voters.
• A Decline in Young Voter Allegiance: Research indicates a significant decrease of votes for the candidate from voters aged 18-29.

A Pattern of Evasion

This refusal aligns with a pattern to avoid difficult realities. It recalls an episode in which virtually every Democratic officeholder in Congress acquiesced to a sitting president's insistence on seeking another term until a poor public debate performance compelled a reversal.

Meanwhile, overwhelming numbers of the electorate were repeatedly informing surveyors that they did not want the incumbent to seek re-election.

Financial Questions

An honest report could investigate issues about campaign spending, such as the amounts were directed to insider consultants and ad buyers during an electoral effort that managed to spend a staggering sum over a few months.

The Underlying Implication

At its core, the blockage surrounding this report points to a deference toward the established hierarchy who engineered an unsuccessful national race. The implication to ordinary supporters – which includes countless loyal volunteers – appears to be that they cannot be trusted to know the lessons the insiders have learned from a report drawing from feedback from all states.

A political entity incapable to publicly examine where it went wrong is unlikely to climb out of the cycle that proved so advantageous to their opponents.